The recent unanimous decision by the Daytona Beach City Commission to implement ZeroEyes gun detection software in public spaces represents a troubling overreach into citizens' privacy and an unnecessary expansion of government surveillance. While public safety is a noble goal, sacrificing individual freedoms and constitutional rights in the name of security is a dangerous precedent.

 

This AI-powered software, which monitors "high-traffic public areas" and alerts authorities when a firearm is brandished, creates a surveillance state in which law-abiding citizens are subjected to constant monitoring. Who ensures that this technology is not misused or abused? Who oversees the accuracy of its threat assessments? False positives or misinterpretations could lead to unwarranted confrontations or worse, while real threats may still evade detection.

Moreover, embedding such technology into existing infrastructure sets a precedent for broader government surveillance capabilities in the future. Today it’s gun detection; tomorrow it could be facial recognition, tracking individuals’ movements, or monitoring behavior deemed "suspicious." How long before this technology is weaponized against peaceful protesters or those exercising their First or Second Amendment rights?

Rather than spending taxpayer dollars on invasive technology, the city should focus on proven methods for reducing crime—supporting community-based initiatives, increasing public engagement, and addressing root causes of violence.

Daytona Beach should not serve as a testing ground for Orwellian surveillance tactics that threaten the very freedoms that define us. This decision should alarm every resident who values privacy and liberty.

Matthew Johnson

About

Matt Johnson is a steadfast advocate for individual liberty & principled governance, who ran for Florida State House District 29. He is the Chair & Communications Committee Chair for the LPF, LNC Region 2 Alternate & Secretary of LP Volusia County.